Choice, ProChoice Style












(thanks to Vlad.com for this Michaelangelaic image) http://http://www.vladville.com/category/gators


Woman, child die in crash on I-94

Tip of the cap to Jivin'Jehoshaphat for this story.....What's most striking is the hypocrisy of the left regarding abortion. It never ends.

As I commented on Jivin', the Chicago Tribune is actually only following its own perverted logic when it calls the dead baby a "fetus." Here's how:

The proabortion movement believes in a world in which women, to paraphrase Justice Kennedy, define their "own concept of existence." In a rejection of plain English, however, abortion supporters interpret this (nonsensical and) completely subjective and solely personal standard as allowing women to apply their own concept of existence to another dependent human life. Result?: If a woman WANTS the baby, it is a "baby." If she DOESN'T want the baby, it's not a baby, it's a "fetus" or something even less (zygote? blob? trash?). So the proabortion people use a totally subjective analysis when they want to permit the killing of the unborn; there is no intrinsic, objective truth at all when it comes to abortion.

Unless, of course, a prolife group wants to define ITS own concept of existence and express its "subjective" opinion that inconvenient unborn human life does have intrinsic value, because it just may turn out to be a Heisman Trophy winner, so perhaps the better "choice" is to NOT kill the nascient human life, even if it is inconvenient to let it live. In this case, the subjective prolife opinion becomes "inflammatory" and "divisive," and not at all a matter of subjective value, but a viewpoint that is "objectively" harmful and must be silenced.

Got it? I don't.